data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df661/df661796de7610a77570aad96d467d749f03d4d2" alt="Intel burn test home"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/71ec6/71ec6f302f57831bfa23986c2db41e4e38f26973" alt="intel burn test home intel burn test home"
Think of IBT/Linx as someone sprinting/running and prime95 as someone jogging or doing an endurance run. I've actually seen programs that can put more stress than IBT but that one was known to kill a few CPUs/rigs. So far if I don't wake up to a bluescreen or a rebooted system then I call it a day. What I do is I find the right voltage with IBT tests then do prime95 overnight. Some people though they see as stability as being able to play games just fine so it really depends on the person on how they see things stable.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3d04/b3d048c962ccd1443f2dc123737c6729908d4fc0" alt="intel burn test home intel burn test home"
I've done IBT tests before where I was positive my overclock was stable but when I left prime95 on overnight it rebooted so I tend to use IBT as a guage to around what voltage I should use and if it does a 12-24hour prime95 just fine then its good to say its fully stable (there have been times when people do prime for 23 hours and fail at the 24 hour mark). Though I wouldnt rule out prime95 out just yet, you could be 100/100 tests on IBT and still fail prime95 after 8 hours or so. Most people only do IBT tests to see if their cooler can handle the temps and most of time if your cpu can handle that amount of stress then it would be stable since most programs/games don't stress as much as these programs do. The only utilities I've ever found that come as close as possible to 100% TDP are Prime95 v26.6 Small FFT's for thermal testing, which is a steady workload, and Asus RealBench for stability testing, which is a fluctuating workload.Īlthough the topic of Prime95 (with and without AVX) was covered, I would like to have seen RealBench included in your test suite, as it's widely accepted as an excellent utility for testing overall system stability, and uses a realistic AVX workload.Both tests have their own methods to putting stress on the CPU with IBT (Linx) putting more stress. However, since Intel validates their thermal specifications at a steady 100% TDP, it's most appropriate to select utilities that don't overload or underload the CPU. This article provides some excellent comparisons.
INTEL BURN TEST HOME SOFTWARE
Since most users test their rigs without a sense of scale for power and temperature, they can't compare apples to apples, especially when combined with major variables such as differences in ambient temperature, hardware configurations and software utilities. Otherwise, great work! I was very pleased to read this article!Ģ0741319 said:As the author of the Intel Temperature Guide - I can fully appreciate how much work went into creating this outstanding article, which has been sorely needed! The only utilities I've ever found that come as close as possible to 100% TDP are Prime95 v26.6 Small FFT's as a steady workload for thermal testing, and Asus RealBench as a fluctuating workload for stability testing.Īlthough the topic of Prime95 (with and without AVX) was covered, I would like to have seen RealBench included in your test suite,since it's widely accepted as an excellent utility for testing overall system stability, and uses a realistic AVX workload. You may also turn on looping with this Burn-In setting. Burn-in Test: Enables all Intel PDT features and runs Intel PDT stress test for 120 minutes. Functional Test: Enables all Intel PDT features and runs Intel PDT stress test for minutes. However, since Intel validates their thermal specifications at a steady 100% TDP, it's most appropriate to select utilities that don't overload or underload the CPU. I have been reading around and they always mention to use Intelburn test then Prime95 to check system stability.I already downloaded pimre95 but I can't. Run Genuine Intel, Brand String, and Frequency Test. Nevertheless, our results are very similar.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0538e/0538eaa3f19791ab3676d2e4380e289239c95357" alt="intel burn test home intel burn test home"
Simplifies the process of selecting a test size to use. Real-time output of results to the screen. The Intel Temperature Guide differs in its approach toward the topic of processor Core temperatures and cooling with respect to Intel's TDP specifications, and distinguishes between steady workloads for thermal testing versus fluctuating workloads for stability testing. Use the same stress-testing engine that Intel uses to test their products before they are packed and put on shelves for sale. This article provides a perspective and some excellent comparisons. As the author of the Intel Temperature Guide - I can fully appreciate how much work went into creating this outstanding article, which has been sorely needed!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df661/df661796de7610a77570aad96d467d749f03d4d2" alt="Intel burn test home"